Are women superior to men?

Selected Version - Version 8 (Current Version) : 15 May 2012 | 01:14 | AztecWarrior

<< Older version | Newer version >>

All versions

Key

  • Text coloured Greenhas been added snce the previous version
  • Text marked red and striked-throughhas been deleted

Changes from Version 7 to Version 8

On the point: Women are not superior!

Actually, the four men who only entered onto this debate to argue against the motion voted against it. And that too based on your/their points: merely because your/their ego/s is/were hurt.
The others only voted after Veclock plagiarized/mutilated all the points on the stereotypically pink left.


That's an absurdly Heterosexual idea.
Women don't need men.

Ipso facto:The human race needs women to continue to proliferate/exist

and men generally make trouble/war.

Women live 5 years longer on average and age at a significantly lower rate; maintaining the pros of their youth for much longer. This point 'was' mentioned earlier with proof but may have been lost in Veclock land.

I think and after asking people this question "are women superior to men" most replied that we are simply equal and i can understand that only women can carry children so without them humans would die off but to create children you also need a man and God realised this- if God thought men were superior why would he choose to create women?

Men need Women and Women need Men.

Let me quote this sentence you just typed..."and men generally make trouble/war." EEE. WRONG. Females are usually the one behind the wars. Let me name one, rather famous, one. Diao Chan. She was a manipulative, evil basterd who brought the end to 2 Kingdoms.

Females live longer because their circulatory and Skeletal systems are more advanced. The man is stronger because he has a superior Muscular system.system$1 
you take the biblical route women are not superior for when Eve ate the apple she was decieved but when adam ate the apple he was not decieved because she knew that Eve made that fatal mistake not Adam

 

No, because... Women are not superior!

Actually, the four men who only entered onto this debate to argue against the motion voted against it. And that too based on your/their points: merely because your/their ego/s is/were hurt. The others only voted after Veclock plagiarized/mutilated all the points on the stereotypically pink left.

That's an absurdly Heterosexual idea. Women don't need men.

Ipso facto:The human race needs women to continue to proliferate/exist

and men generally make trouble/war.

Women live 5 years longer on average and age at a significantly lower rate; maintaining the pros of their youth for much longer. This point 'was' mentioned earlier with proof but may have been lost in Veclock land.

 

I think and after asking people this question "are women superior to men" most replied that we are simply equal and i can understand that only women can carry children so without them humans would die off but to create children you also need a man and God realised this- if God thought men were superior why would he choose to create women?

Men need Women and Women need Men.

Let me quote this sentence you just typed..."and men generally make trouble/war." EEE. WRONG. Females are usually the one behind the wars. Let me name one, rather famous, one. Diao Chan. She was a manipulative, evil basterd who brought the end to 2 Kingdoms.

Females live longer because their circulatory and Skeletal systems are more advanced. The man is stronger because he has a superior Muscular system. you take the biblical route women are not superior for when Eve ate the apple she was decieved but when adam ate the apple he was not decieved because she knew that Eve made that fatal mistake not Adam

 
22 February 2011