- + Brigettegill joined Debatewise
- + Simpsongqi joined Debatewise
- + Moogmaclan I joined Debatewise
- + Seniallealm joined Debatewise
- + Blogsma joined Debatewise
- + Zaini Zainab joined Debatewise
- + Sarahjoygoodman joined Debatewise
- + Penf Dumn joined Debatewise
- + Skritch joined Debatewise
- + Saachin.Simpson joined Debatewise
- + Barry Juix joined Debatewise
- + Mantcece Sed70 joined Debatewise
- + Carpinteyrojpv joined Debatewise
- + Mantcece Sed603 joined Debatewise
- + Vladstronsy joined Debatewise
- + Illire Deque joined Debatewise
- + Sylvanus49 joined Debatewise
- + Lie Smart Ayo17 joined Debatewise
- + Steven Allyn Taylor joined Debatewise
- + Chabu joined Debatewise
- + Juljul2221 joined Debatewise
- + Patrick Leitch joined Debatewise
- + Scoolfeds joined Debatewise
- + Maciej Pielachowski joined Debatewise
- + Seiliacek Kese897 joined Global Youth Panel
- + Werbehoguehob joined Debatewise
- + Gabby2807 joined Debatewise
- + Endattids joined Debatewise
- + Urbaday joined Debatewise
- + Varma joined Debatewise
Are women superior to men?
Selected Version - Version 14 (Current Version) : 22 Feb 2012 | 07:50 | Roshan18
All versions
- Version 14 (Current Version) 22 Feb 2012 Roshan18
- Version 14 (Current Version) 22 Feb 2012 Roshan18
- Version 13 27 Jun 2010 Tang Shui
- Version 13 27 Jun 2010 Tang Shui
- Version 12 20 May 2010 NADIA999
- Version 11 08 May 2010 NADIA999
- Version 10 05 May 2010 NADIA999
- Version 9 03 May 2010 NADIA999
- Version 8 29 Dec 2009 NADIA999
- Version 7 29 Dec 2009 NADIA999
- Version 6 23 Oct 2009 Purple Bandit
- Version 5 22 Oct 2009 Purple Bandit
- Version 4 14 Oct 2009 NADIA999
- Version 3 14 Oct 2009 NADIA999
- Version 2 14 Oct 2009 NADIA999
- Version 1 12 Oct 2009 iamspartacus.1
Key
- Text coloured Greenhas been added snce the previous version
- Text marked
red and striked-throughhas been deleted
|
Changes from Version 13 to Version 14
|
|||||||
No, because... The men's arguments are legitimate where as the womens are stupid!
The men have presented no statistical/factual evidence to support their (self-proclaimed) 'meritorious' argumentation and have now resorted to name-calling.
This very immature excommunication, is why more men have weight problems, die of heart-attacks, cause and fight bloody wars/battles, commit suicide after the age of seventy( thus more women pass the age hundred mark), are responsible for more violent crimes/terrorism, are clinically paranoid, stalk/kill/rape can't swim the English channel even half as fast, get into 'accidents' and die within the age range of 20 to 25 yrs(despite the fact that more women of that age are attacked by criminals) because of testosterone-generated risk-taking,rash and irrational behavior. There are lots of nice article links & quotations from news sources on this blog[1]
The Romans crucified Spartacus.
Hmm... I think I have a fair idea of who's been deleting points on Google wave. "veclock" is it?
Point is 'more' men commit 'more' violent crimes than women do. Though some men are apparently too slow to understand that point.
Testosterone: you were born with it. It is not your fault.
The men's arguments have had merit to them, but the women have argued they are better swimmers and drivers. Enough said.
Just because some men commit crimes doesn't mean that all of them do, and besides, there were lots of good men too.
You are wrong in this area..."is why more men have weight problems, die of heart-attacks, cause and fight bloody wars/battles..." Men have more weight problems and heart attacks because our skeletal and circulatory system isn't as advanced as the women's, whereas the man's muscular and nervous system is more advanced.
Women tend to WANT to be superior, but they can't, because they aren't. Men aren't superior, but they seem to want to be superior less.
Women's have waged war and have been seen to not want to step down on the field of politics. Look at Gloria Arroyo, Indira Gandhi. All Corrupt and unwilling to step down. They never really got any substance when standing for election. They rather appeal to emotions which is less legitimate in terms of argumentations.