Are women superior to men?

Selected Version - Version 3 (Current Version) : 22 Feb 2012 | 08:04 | Roshan18

<< Older version | Newer version >>

All versions

Key

  • Text coloured Greenhas been added snce the previous version
  • Text marked red and striked-throughhas been deleted

Changes from Version 2 to Version 3

On the point: Both the sexes are equal

Men need women and women need men. Men are physically superior and women are emotionally superior. There's a perfect balance. Why doesn't anybody see that? Both the groups are part of the human race and there is absolutely no reason to wage a war against one another. The human race would not exist without these two groups. One should never generalize. Not all women are inborn multitaskers, gourmet chefs and emotion experts and not all men are egoistic bastards. I know some men who are very sweet and are active supporters of womens' rights and I know some women (including me :D) that cannot multitask, socialize etc. for nuts! In reply to a post here which referred to some two year old girl who's got an IQ greater than that of Bill Gates and Stephen Hawking combined, she's only an INDIVIDUAL and doesn't stand for the entire female race. It's almost like saying that all two year olds have superior brains just because she does. And this girl is, what is known as a 'child prodigy'. Something we have here in India too. People who start singing opera at the age of 3, people who do motorbike stunts at the age of 14 etc. so this is no exception whatsoever. I conclude to say that both these sexes are equal and there should be no battle for a superior position for measly things like this. Thank you. :)

Men need women and women need men. Men are physically superior and women are emotionally superior. superior (if we were to concede your point). There's a perfect balance. Why doesn't anybody see that?
Both the groups are part of the human race and there is absolutely no reason to wage a war against one another. The human race would not exist without these two groups.
One should never generalize. Not all women are inborn multitaskers, gourmet chefs and emotion experts and not all men are egoistic bastards. I know some men who are very sweet and are active supporters of womens' rights and I know some women (including me :D) that cannot multitask, socialize etc. for nuts!
In reply to a post here which referred to some two year old girl who's got an IQ greater than that of Bill Gates and Stephen Hawking combined, she's only an INDIVIDUAL and doesn't stand for the entire female race. It's almost like saying that all two year olds have superior brains just because she does. And this girl is, what is known as a 'child prodigy'. Something we have here in India too. People who start singing opera at the age of 3, people who do motorbike stunts at the age of 14 etc. so this is no exception whatsoever.
I conclude to say that both these sexes are equal and there should be no battle for a superior position for measly things like this. Thank you. :):$1   
You are going against the motion and also your burden of proof. You conceded that men are physically superior when you deny it countless times. If so what is the urgency of this debate?

Yes, because...

 

No, because... Both the sexes are equal

Men need women and women need men. Men are physically superior and women are emotionally superior. There's a perfect balance. Why doesn't anybody see that? Both the groups are part of the human race and there is absolutely no reason to wage a war against one another. The human race would not exist without these two groups. One should never generalize. Not all women are inborn multitaskers, gourmet chefs and emotion experts and not all men are egoistic bastards. I know some men who are very sweet and are active supporters of womens' rights and I know some women (including me :D) that cannot multitask, socialize etc. for nuts! In reply to a post here which referred to some two year old girl who's got an IQ greater than that of Bill Gates and Stephen Hawking combined, she's only an INDIVIDUAL and doesn't stand for the entire female race. It's almost like saying that all two year olds have superior brains just because she does. And this girl is, what is known as a 'child prodigy'. Something we have here in India too. People who start singing opera at the age of 3, people who do motorbike stunts at the age of 14 etc. so this is no exception whatsoever. I conclude to say that both these sexes are equal and there should be no battle for a superior position for measly things like this. Thank you. :)

 

Men need women and women need men. Men are physically superior and women are emotionally superior (if we were to concede your point). There's a perfect balance. Why doesn't anybody see that? Both the groups are part of the human race and there is absolutely no reason to wage a war against one another. The human race would not exist without these two groups. One should never generalize. Not all women are inborn multitaskers, gourmet chefs and emotion experts and not all men are egoistic bastards. I know some men who are very sweet and are active supporters of womens' rights and I know some women (including me :D) that cannot multitask, socialize etc. for nuts! In reply to a post here which referred to some two year old girl who's got an IQ greater than that of Bill Gates and Stephen Hawking combined, she's only an INDIVIDUAL and doesn't stand for the entire female race. It's almost like saying that all two year olds have superior brains just because she does. And this girl is, what is known as a 'child prodigy'. Something we have here in India too. People who start singing opera at the age of 3, people who do motorbike stunts at the age of 14 etc. so this is no exception whatsoever. I conclude to say that both these sexes are equal and there should be no battle for a superior position for measly things like this. Thank you. :)

You are going against the motion and also your burden of proof. You conceded that men are physically superior when you deny it countless times. If so what is the urgency of this debate?

 
22 February 2011