Should private schools be abolished?

Selected Version - Version 3 (Current Version) : 28 Oct 2009 | 23:44 | abolishprivateschools

<< Older version | Newer version >>

All versions

Key

  • Text coloured Greenhas been added snce the previous version
  • Text marked red and striked-throughhas been deleted

Changes from Version 2 to Version 3

On the point: Hello peoples!!

"Private education opens doors"...

..but it is these same doors that the majority of gifted pupils of state schools do not even get a chance to walk towards.

Both sides of this debate have verified that a child will be given a better education at a state school. A well educated human being is certainly far more understanding of themselves and the world around them and although I have no proof, it seems sensible to assume that these well educated individuals will be more likely to "succeed" in society. But what it means to succeed in society is a topic to be debated in itself.

However, we all have our own understanding of what it means to succeed, yet I am certain many state school pupils do not even get a glimpse of their own participation in this. Which is where the absurdity of the schools division appears.

The only rebuke of an abolishment of private schools would come from the families who are funding their offsprings heightened education, and if it was to be declared that they would no longer have to pay so much for the their sons and daughters schooling but would instead HAVE to enrol them to state schools. Then schools, then the quality of teaching at these "common" schools will be greatly increased by demand of the pre-private schooled parents/guardians. As a result the divide that exists between toffs and serfs will eventually be levelled. And all pupils shall be considered gifted pupils.

I live in hope.

This case is that “private schools, meaning a school that is not run by government, “should”, indicating it ought to happen “be abolished”, to be taken away or cease to exit. Private education opens door, not shut them down. The choice is ours. Parent should be able to choose where their children get their education and the quality of the education. Also, parent should not be penalised for providing their child/children with better educations by sending them to private schools. Abolishing private schools is not going to abolish inequality between the students as this inequality can be shown everyday in government or public schools. An example would be bullying. Bullying happening very often in both private and state schools. So therefore, I say that Private education opens door, not shut them down. So that’s why we should NOT abolish private schools.

 

No, because... Hello peoples!!

"Private education opens doors"...

..but it is these same doors that the majority of gifted pupils of state schools do not even get a chance to walk towards.

Both sides of this debate have verified that a child will be given a better education at a state school. A well educated human being is certainly far more understanding of themselves and the world around them and although I have no proof, it seems sensible to assume that these well educated individuals will be more likely to "succeed" in society. But what it means to succeed in society is a topic to be debated in itself.

However, we all have our own understanding of what it means to succeed, yet I am certain many state school pupils do not even get a glimpse of their own participation in this. Which is where the absurdity of the schools division appears.

The only rebuke of an abolishment of private schools would come from the families who are funding their offsprings heightened education, and if it was to be declared that they would no longer have to pay so much for their sons and daughters schooling but would instead HAVE to enrol them to state schools, then the quality of teaching at these "common" schools will be greatly increased by demand of the pre-private schooled parents/guardians. As a result the divide that exists between toffs and serfs will eventually be levelled. And all pupils shall be considered gifted pupils.

I live in hope.

 

This case is that “private schools, meaning a school that is not run by government, “should”, indicating it ought to happen “be abolished”, to be taken away or cease to exit. Private education opens door, not shut them down. The choice is ours. Parent should be able to choose where their children get their education and the quality of the education. Also, parent should not be penalised for providing their child/children with better educations by sending them to private schools. Abolishing private schools is not going to abolish inequality between the students as this inequality can be shown everyday in government or public schools. An example would be bullying. Bullying happening very often in both private and state schools. So therefore, I say that Private education opens door, not shut them down. So that’s why we should NOT abolish private schools.

 
22 February 2011