- + Eurorcevete joined Debatewise
- + Patrick Leitch joined Debatewise
- + Seniallealm joined Debatewise
- + Juljul2221 joined Debatewise
- + Werbehoguehob joined Debatewise
- + Timothy Orzeszek joined Debatewise
- + Moogmaclan I joined Debatewise
- + Barry Skaw joined Debatewise
- + Yoskha D. Adrianto joined Debatewise
- + Barry Nism joined Global Youth Panel
- + Steven Allyn Taylor joined Debatewise
- + Saachin.Simpson joined Debatewise
- + Seiliacek Kese897 joined Global Youth Panel
- + Maciej Pielachowski joined Debatewise
- + Locksgydff joined Debatewise
- + Penf Dumn joined Debatewise
- + Varma joined Debatewise
- + Simpsongqi joined Debatewise
- + Nirmal Kumar joined Debatewise
- + Mantcece Sed603 joined Debatewise
- + Seng9153 joined Debatewise
- + Skritch joined Debatewise
- + Scoolfeds joined Debatewise
- + Deonvoff joined Debatewise
- + Blogsma joined Debatewise
- + Chaci joined Debatewise
- + Urbaday joined Debatewise
- + Sararozmus joined Debatewise
- + Hülya joined Debatewise
- + Poldimpailm joined Debatewise
DO YOU BELIEVE THE JOBBIK POLITICIANS THAT THEIR PARTY WISHES TO PURSUE A PRAGMATIC POLICY OF ROMA INTEGRATION?
The outcome of the mayoral by-election demonstrated that inciting conflict is in the political interests of Jobbik and other far-right organisations. Oszkár Juhász, the Jobbik candidate, was elected mayor by winning one-third of votes and Tamás Eszes, the candidate of Defence Force (Véderõ), received 10.5 per cent of the votes, which means that together far-right candidates picked up almost 45 per cent ... Juhász – who brought up the rear in the 2010 local government elections with just 5.8 per cent – was the only candidate with the official support of a party. That worked to his advantage rather than disadvantage. ... It may have contributed to Juhász’s success that he offered the village’s residents a relatively “clear-headed”, “moderate” alternative compared to Eszes. As the Jobbik politicians implied at the press conference to evaluate the result, the party wishes to pursue a pragmatic policy of Roma integration in Gyöngyöspata designed to ease the conflict. All political players are forced to adopt pragmatic politics when they gain positions of leadership. It remains questionable, however, whether Jobbik will find other means to gain local and national political positions in the future than strident anti-Roma rhetoric in a social medium where there is visibly and measurably strong demand for such rhetoric.
Do you believe the Jobbik politicians that their party wishes to pursue a pragmatic policy of Roma integration?
No, because... Perhaps pragmatic policy on exploiting EU funds matters
May be they want to use "pro-Roma" rhetorics in order to high-jack some EU funds aimed for Roma integration. But the genuine "good will" is not a factor in this political game at all...
Do you believe the Jobbik politicians that their party wishes to pursue a pragmatic policy of Roma integration?
No, because... Jobbik should not be trusted on Roma or anything else
Jobbik MEPs had no qualms about telling the Reuters press agency in September 2010 that members of the Roma minority considered a “threat to public safety” should be forcibly evicted and housed in camps under close surveillance, “for life” if necessary. Hungarian MEP Csanad Szegedi, the party vice-chair, told Reuters: “We would force these families out of their dwellings… Then, yes, we would transport these families to public order protection camps… No doubt there will be people who show no improvement. They can spend the rest of their lives in these camps.” (See Dunai, Marton, “Hungary’s far-right wants to round up Roma in camps”, The Star, 01 September 2010, available at http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/855668--hungary-s-far-right-wants-to-round-up-roma-in-camps). That's not "pragmatic", it's fascist, and there must be no tolerance for such proposals anywhere on this planet in the 21st century.
Point 1. Perhaps pragmatic policy on exploiting EU funds matters
May be they want to use "pro-Roma" rhetorics in order to high-jack some EU funds aimed for Roma integration. But the genuine "good will" is not a factor in this political game at all...
Point 2. Jobbik should not be trusted on Roma or anything else
Jobbik MEPs had no qualms about telling the Reuters press agency in September 2010 that members of the Roma minority considered a “threat to public safety” should be forcibly evicted and housed in camps under close surveillance, “for life” if necessary. Hungarian MEP Csanad Szegedi, the party vice-chair, told Reuters: “We would force these families out of their dwellings… Then, yes, we would transport these families to public order protection camps… No doubt there will be people who show no improvement. They can spend the rest of their lives in these camps.” (See Dunai, Marton, “Hungary’s far-right wants to round up Roma in camps”, The Star, 01 September 2010, available at http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/855668--hungary-s-far-right-wants-to-round-up-roma-in-camps). That's not "pragmatic", it's fascist, and there must be no tolerance for such proposals anywhere on this planet in the 21st century.