This house would stop Google from taking over the world.

World dominance has nothing to do with helping or not helping people. It has to do with controlling what people do, use and work with. It has to do with unfairly driving business away from competitors who sell better products and services. It has to do with ensuring that no other company can be allowed to compete.

World domination is the infringement of borders, Google has been accused of espionage by China, By several European countries and Google's copyright violations are a given. Most of the internet world uses Google as our primary search engine and Youtube as their primary video-sharing/viewing resource. Why don't we trust other video sharing sites? Why is it always Youtube first?
The same goes for search engines.

"Googlezon, GoogleWorld, just plain Google ;whatever you call it, it's scaring the wits out of everyone from the power lunchers of Hollywood to Madison Avenue ad moguls to Silicon Valley entrepreneurs. Now, after years of hand-wringing and thumb-twiddling, some of them are pulling out the heavy artillery and firing one round after another on the Googleplex, the company's headquarters in Mountain View, Calif. The latest salvo: On Mar. 22, NBC Universal and News Corp. (NWS) announced big plans for a rival to Google's enormously popular YouTube video site that will run not only television show clips but even full-length movies on Yahoo! (YHOO ), AOL (TWX ), Microsoft's MSN, MySpace.com, and other partner sites.
JUST THE WEEK BEFORE, Viacom sued Google for a headline-grabbing $1 billion, charging YouTube with willfully infringing on copyrights by allowing users to upload clips of The Colbert Report, South Park, and other TV shows. A couple of weeks earlier, Copiepress, a group representing Belgian and German newspapers, won a copyright case that could sharply limit Google's usefulness if it sets a precedent. And get this: In the Valley and Washington, D.C., there's even cocktail party chatter about whether the search giant's power needs to be reined in by antitrust regulators. It's unlikely to happen but is an indication of rivals' growing trepidation about Google. Says Paul Martino, chief executive of the search service Aggregate Knowledge Inc.: "We're beginning to see the Anything But Google' backlash." [[http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_15/b4029001.htm]][[http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_15/b4029001.htm]$1  
1. The success of Google will only make other companies better, if these other companies are allowed to compete on a fair and legal platform. 
We're not simply talking about competitors though, many Start-ups use Google freeware and are delivered Patent fee charges within a week of their launch because the freeware is free to the public and not companies. Google needs to stop being sneaky and implicit.  
2. By unfairly and deviously flushing out competition, Google is not expending its resources on making it's product better (or the best it can be) instead it is making sure that no better products/services which are made, can be launched from/by any other company.

Google will not take the world to itself, it is impossible. Nobody can take the world to itself. Just because of that fact we should'nt stop google from taking over the world. It is good. Google is good. Every fact we can see in this debate is true, but no one is bad. We need to support google because of many facts like: Google is common used browser in the world, so it can't be bad. (Something that mostly people like, can't be bad) Google+ is good for many reason, but let put this into this way: Existence of google+ will make facebook to be better. Competition is always good. Conclusion is: If we let google+ to try to take the world to itself (imposible), facebook, twitter and other social network will be forced to be better, and that is good. Something about android. Well, it is a fact that apple is one big corporation. But, it is corporation that exist on advertising. It is bad if we pay some product (apple) 1000$, than if we pay the same thing (android) 300$. The main conclusion is that it is very good if we let google to take the most of the world to itself because of two things:

1. Success of Google will make other companies to be better, and we, as humanity, will have a great products.

2. If google make its product to the best, we will have a great products we can use.